|
Post by Genisis on Feb 21, 2004 17:05:01 GMT -5
I really dont think you understand how it works, the Gravity Cannon was not a Rail Gun, or they would have called it, and described it as such, not note it as a weapon meant completelly to invert the laws of psychics, If the Shells were the only reason the Sink could be formed there would be NO way the Blade Liger could have been fired from that Cannon.. which is what happened and i'm sure you overlooked that detail Genisis. Funny, I am rewatching the episode where they describe what the Gravity Cannon is and how it works, and even funnier, it is EXACTLY as I posted. Go rewatch the episode Mursk. BEFORE you stick your foot further in your mouth.
|
|
legoliger
Captain
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee i have shiny and spikey wrist bands
Posts: 449
|
Post by legoliger on Feb 21, 2004 17:07:01 GMT -5
he should also check the link i put up and do what it says to see the liger in the gravity cannon
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 17:10:54 GMT -5
Wow, Genisis what is your problem,.. you have serious temper issues. I know what the cannon does, if you want to play this game I have 65 Episodes on my Harddrive, I can load it up in a flash. my argument is why you think the Shell does anything when the same effect was accomplished with the Blade Liger. and it was not made of the same material, nor specially engineered..
|
|
|
Post by Colodie on Feb 21, 2004 17:15:27 GMT -5
I am now confused. First, I assume you mean Blade Liger instead of Liger Zero.
They don't have the same effect. The shell makes a big black hole explosion of doom (with pretty colors I might add), while the Blade Liger just shot through the Death Saurer.... at least I think so, I don't have the episodes with me, so I could be wrong....
|
|
|
Post by Genisis on Feb 21, 2004 17:19:57 GMT -5
Wow, Genisis what is your problem,.. you have serious temper issues. I know what the cannon does, if you want to play this game I have 65 Episodes on my Harddrive, I can load it up in a flash. my argument is why you think the Shell does anything when the same effect was accomplished with the Liger Zero. and it was not made of the same material, nor specially engineered.. I am too busy laughing my butt off at your last post and the mistakes in it to properly respond........ Yes Colodie, you are right.
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 17:25:43 GMT -5
I am too busy laughing my butt off at your last post and the mistakes in it to properly respond........ Yes Colodie, you are right. They are called Typos, i've seen them come from you so don't even pretend you are perfect.. merely childish and tempermental.. one obviouslly not fit for anything close to a position of authority...
|
|
|
Post by Genisis on Feb 21, 2004 17:28:08 GMT -5
They are called Typos, i've seen them come from you so don't even pretend you are perfect.. merely childish and tempermental.. one obviouslly not fit for anything close to a position of authority... It isnt the typos I am laughing at.............
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 17:39:39 GMT -5
It isnt the typos I am laughing at............. Potentially the inconsistancies with your own theory. A Gravity Cannon cannot fire a Blade Liger if it requires a specificlly made Shell. I do not fully understand your mental depravities Genisis but i'm still wondering why you say the Gravity Cannon needs a special Shell to be made just for it, yet be able to fire a Blade Liger from it.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Feb 21, 2004 17:50:24 GMT -5
The Gravity Cannon is a large gun. The shells do the damage. Thats like a Shotgun, Buckshot or a solid shell, hard nose, or hollow, doesnt matter, the gun shoots what you put in it. This is true about the hammer of the gun, if it fires like a normal cannon. The hammer of the cannon would have seriosly crippled the Blade Liger, crushing its hind quarters. When a gun fires, there is gun powder in the back of the bullet that explodes on impact of the hammer, and if the hammer would have hit the blade liger, it would have crippled it, maybe shooting it from the barrel for maybe a couple yards, sense there was nothing to project it farther. Now my theory is that the Gravity Cannon actually fires like the HoverCargo's ramp, only much stronger. Doesnt the cargo shoot out a liger zero at a whale king? well it could be the same principle, just alot... LOT larger scale.
just an opinoin, dont flame ^_^
|
|
|
Post by Colodie on Feb 21, 2004 17:55:54 GMT -5
The idea is that the gun is a Rail Gun or a Gauss Rifle or whatever you want to call it. If it is a Gauss Rifle (I just prefer that name...), whatever it is firing must be magnetic. Also, a Gauss Rifle require huge ammounts of power, and so does the Gravity Cannon. Also, if the Gravity Cannon is a Gauss Rifle, and the Blade Liger is magnetic, it would explain why the Blade Liger can survive being shot from it.
Actually., the Blade Liger isn't really streamlined or anything. Most modern guns have riflings or something in them to spin the bullet, making it more accurate. If the Gravity Cannon has that, it would be pretty hard to aim, as the Blade Liger couldn't use the rifling(?).
Also, there's nothing to prevent the Blade Liger from tumbling in the barrel and being destroyed at high speeds. It doesn't fit exactly in the barrel, and if a leg moves slightly up or down....
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 18:03:12 GMT -5
The Blade Liger formed an E-Shield before it was Shot, turning it into a giant Ball, but from what had been explained several times in the Show, the Gun did not fire electromagneticlly but instead fired through an impractical theory of roating the Gravitational Pull of the Universe JUST inside the barrel of the Cannon (as bizarre as that sounds) there is not Hammer or Pin, just akimbo Gravity Sink dynamics.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Feb 21, 2004 18:39:04 GMT -5
I do not fully understand your mental depravities Genisis but i'm still wondering why you say the Gravity Cannon needs a special Shell to be made just for it, yet be able to fire a Blade Liger from it. And They are called Typos, i've seen them come from you so don't even pretend you are perfect.. merely childish and tempermental.. one obviouslly not fit for anything close to a position of authority... Not meaning to start anything, but it's childish to insult someone, ecspecially during a debate. You shouldn't be trying to put someone down, saying they dont belong in their place of authority, simple because they don't agree with you. I think your the one being childish, but like I said, thats my opinion, and flame at your own risk.
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 18:44:04 GMT -5
I am too busy laughing my butt off at your last post and the mistakes in it to properly respond........ Yes Colodie, you are right. Sorry Wolfy, but I was calm and collective untill such post was made, it is actually an Insult no matter how you cut it, and he has done so many times with many other Members, it is a passive agressive, anti-social attitude. hence depraived
|
|
|
Post by Wolfy on Feb 21, 2004 18:46:03 GMT -5
I agree with what your saying, but you could at least have been the better person, and ignored any coment made. Even if he started it, that doesnt give you the right to retaliate. Wouldn't have looked better for you if you would have ignored him, and showed more maturity?
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 18:51:16 GMT -5
Frankly saying.. i'm not the one who is showing immaturity right now, this is no slight against you but I do have a right to face my agressors, I am calm, but when someone insults me I respond vigorouslly and most do not consider that a fault.. most could say it is Immaturity to attack unprovoked.. such I have not done on these Boards.
|
|