Juno
Major
Juno the numero uno
Posts: 941
|
Post by Juno on Feb 21, 2004 3:51:18 GMT -5
With those attached, would it then be possible to replace the thruster wings with the cp-10 cannons?
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 3:58:06 GMT -5
I think Molga could beat Death Saurer, if there was no pilot in the Death Saurer and it was propped up so it wouldn't fall onto the Molga.
|
|
|
Post by DeathSaurer12 on Feb 21, 2004 9:19:05 GMT -5
No it couldn't. Death Saurer is INVINCEIBLE!!!!!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannotaur on Feb 21, 2004 16:14:02 GMT -5
No it couldn't. Death Saurer is INVINCEIBLE!!!!!!! ;D And yet Van defeated it twice.. I wonder if the thrusters could support the Death Saurers weight tho.. How much more does the DS weigh than the Iron Kong?
|
|
|
Post by DeathSaurer12 on Feb 21, 2004 16:21:10 GMT -5
The first Death Saurer was a weak clone. And in the last episode OF GF, the Blade Liger would have been destroyed from being shot out of the Gravity Cannon. Think about it. In order th fire the Blade Liger out at high speeds, there would have to be a very large amount of something exposive to fire it, or a really big metal thinghy to puch it really hard. No matter whitch is used in the Grav. Cannon, it would have destroyed the Blade Lger. (beacause of the really big explosion, or the really big metal poker-thingy hot the Blade Liger really fast, and destroying it. So, the *Real* Death Saurer is, infack, iNVINCIBLE!!!!!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Colodie on Feb 21, 2004 16:24:45 GMT -5
It could have been a Rail Gun or a Gauss Rifle, probably was seeing as they needed massive power to, er, power it.
A Rail Gun or Gauss Rifle uses a series of magnets to propel something. Just need the Blade Liger to be made of something magnetic. Now, whether Van could survive the sudden acceleration and then the landing afterwords., hmm....
|
|
|
Post by Genisis on Feb 21, 2004 16:25:11 GMT -5
The first Death Saurer was a weak clone. And in the last episode OF GF, the Blade Liger would have been destroyed from being shot out of the Gravity Cannon. Think about it. In order th fire the Blade Liger out at high speeds, there would have to be a very large amount of something exposive to fire it, or a really big metal thinghy to puch it really hard. No matter whitch is used in the Grav. Cannon, it would have destroyed the Blade Lger. (beacause of the really big explosion, or the really big metal poker-thingy hot the Blade Liger really fast, and destroying it. So, the *Real* Death Saurer is, infack, iNVINCIBLE!!!!!!! ;D Not all guns use explosives or "a really big metal thinghy to puch it really hard" to fire projectiles. Look up an electromagnetic railgun sometime. And nothing is invincible. Both the Proto Death Saurer and the original Death Saurer were destroyed, so they wernt invincible. EDIT: damn, I must really type slow today.
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 16:32:31 GMT -5
The reason why it is called a Gravity Cannon explains how it works, I don't understand Dr. D very well but the conclusion is that the Cannon alters the laws of Gravity, so much infact the they are shifted completely in it's direction, sort of creating a Gravity Sink on the point of impact. the closer it goes the faster it travels almost like a gigantic Magnet. sort of like dropping a Ball of Lead from a skyscraper. the farther it drops the more inertia it generates.. same principal but it's direction is completelly changed.
|
|
Raven
Captain
Join my RPG http://zdft.proboards18.com/index.cgi
Posts: 442
|
Post by Raven on Feb 21, 2004 16:34:02 GMT -5
The reason why it is called a Gravity Cannon explains how it works, I don't understand Dr. D very well but the conclusion is that the Cannon alters the laws of Gravity, so much infact the they are shifted completely in it's direction, sort of creating a Gravity Sink on the point of impact. the closer it goes the faster it travels almost like a gigantic Magnet. sort of like dropping a Ball of Lead from a skyscraper. the farther it drops the more inertia it generates.. same principal but it's direction is completelly changed. you mean a dark hole not a gravity sink
|
|
|
Post by Genisis on Feb 21, 2004 16:34:15 GMT -5
The reason why it is called a Gravity Cannon explains how it works, I don't understand Dr. D very well but the conclusion is that the Cannon alters the laws of Gravity, so much infact the they are shifted completely in it's direction, sort of creating a Gravity Sink on the point of impact. the closer it goes the faster it travels almost like a gigantic Magnet. sort of like dropping a Ball of Lead from a skyscraper. the farther it drops the more inertia it generates.. same principal but it's direction is completelly changed. That is the description of the shell the Gravity Cannon fires.
|
|
|
Post by Genisis on Feb 21, 2004 16:36:13 GMT -5
With those attached, would it then be possible to replace the thruster wings with the cp-10 cannons? It is possible to use the same attachments to mount a CP-10, but the pegs would have to be built up some as they are much smaller then the diameter of the mounting hole on the CP-10. I can put one together if you want to see what one looks like.
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 16:41:32 GMT -5
That is the description of the shell the Gravity Cannon fires. How so? everything happens within the chamber of the Cannon opposite of the actually Barrel.. if this technology was made inside the actually shell.. how was the Blade Liger fired from it? the Gravity Cannon Shells take so long due to the emmense ammount of enertial stress they must endure, such can be counteracted by the Blade Liger's E-Shield I presume however.
|
|
|
Post by Genisis on Feb 21, 2004 16:53:04 GMT -5
How so? everything happens within the chamber of the Cannon opposite of the actually Barrel.. if this technology was made inside the actually shell.. how was the Blade Liger fired from it? the Gravity Cannon Shells take so long due to the emmense ammount of enertial stress they must endure, such can be counteracted by the Blade Liger's E-Shield I presume however. The properties of the metel the shell was composed of were what created the Gravity Sink, not the firing of the shell. You should of paid more attention to the description of the weapon when the episode aired. The Cannon itself was just an oversized Rail gun used to fire the imensly dense shell. The giant power generator mounted oppisite the cannon was needed to power the electromagnetic coils to fire the shell. It was because of the special properties of the metal the shell was composed of that there were only 3 shells, this due to complexity in forming them. A 4th shell was formed to combat the Death Saurer to little use.
|
|
|
Post by Mursk on Feb 21, 2004 16:57:49 GMT -5
The properties of the metel the shell was composed of were what created the Gravity Sink, not the firing of the shell. You should of paid more attention to the description of the weapon when the episode aired. The Cannon itself was just an oversized Rail gun used to fire the imensly dense shell. The giant power generator mounted oppisite the cannon was needed to power the electromagnetic coils to fire the shell. It was because of the special properties of the metal the shell was composed of that there were only 3 shells, this due to complexity in forming them. A 4th shell was formed to combat the Death Saurer to little use. I really dont think you understand how it works, the Gravity Cannon was not a Rail Gun, or they would have called it, and described it as such, not note it as a weapon meant completelly to invert the laws of psychics, If the Shells were the only reason the Sink could be formed there would be NO way the Blade Liger could have been fired from that Cannon.. which is what happened and i'm sure you overlooked that detail Genisis.
|
|
legoliger
Captain
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee i have shiny and spikey wrist bands
Posts: 449
|
Post by legoliger on Feb 21, 2004 17:02:48 GMT -5
|
|