|
BF-02
Feb 1, 2004 23:39:05 GMT -5
Post by SturmTyrann on Feb 1, 2004 23:39:05 GMT -5
On Berserk Fuhrers stickes there is a couple that say BF-02 Why is that? What hapened to the the BF-01? Did the first Berserk fuhrer fail to meet the expectations? Just wonder why this is.
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 2, 2004 0:13:42 GMT -5
Post by Colodie on Feb 2, 2004 0:13:42 GMT -5
I don't think there's any official explaination. They probably though that BF-02 would sound more advanced and such than BF-01, but I don't know for sure...
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 2, 2004 5:11:22 GMT -5
Post by Bleidd on Feb 2, 2004 5:11:22 GMT -5
Maybe BF-01 was the prototype, this is supposed to be the production model.
Bleidd
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 2, 2004 18:33:00 GMT -5
Post by LordGale on Feb 2, 2004 18:33:00 GMT -5
I use BF-01 as the Storm Unit in my fic.
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 3, 2004 17:20:06 GMT -5
Post by littlebro on Feb 3, 2004 17:20:06 GMT -5
Thats what I was just wondering about last night lol I bet the BF-01 was probably a different kind of Beserk Fury like Model A and the one we are familiar with is Model B
OR its Buster Fury
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 3, 2004 23:21:29 GMT -5
Post by Tyrann on Feb 3, 2004 23:21:29 GMT -5
I've wondered about that ever since I got him. My guess would be that it has to do with the box-story of the models.
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 12:31:24 GMT -5
Post by Phenotype on Feb 4, 2004 12:31:24 GMT -5
Thats what I was just wondering about last night lol I bet the BF-01 was probably a different kind of Beserk Fury like Model A and the one we are familiar with is Model B OR its Buster Fury How could it be Buster Fury considering Berserk Fuhrer came out a year before Buster Eagle? Stupid "Fuzors", confusing everyone... -Phenotype
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 12:32:27 GMT -5
Post by Andy F² on Feb 4, 2004 12:32:27 GMT -5
Not sure, but BF-01 could be the stripped down version with no armour.
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 12:40:25 GMT -5
Post by steelx on Feb 4, 2004 12:40:25 GMT -5
well maybe when bf has no armor like in nc it is bf 1. and then it has armor and its cpcs maby its bf 2. just a thought.
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 13:56:07 GMT -5
Post by Phenotype on Feb 4, 2004 13:56:07 GMT -5
Not sure, but BF-01 could be the stripped down version with no armour. That's what I was thinking. -Phenotype
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 15:20:19 GMT -5
Post by Tyrannotaur on Feb 4, 2004 15:20:19 GMT -5
BF-01 is most likley the prototype Beserk Fury. The actual model that was put into mass production is BF-02. Anyone translate the Fury's box? (the Tomy one)
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 17:26:47 GMT -5
Post by littlebro on Feb 4, 2004 17:26:47 GMT -5
Oh I forgot all about that when I said "Or its Buster Fury" lol forgot all about the Fury bein out long before Eagle did
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 18:47:03 GMT -5
Post by Colodie on Feb 4, 2004 18:47:03 GMT -5
Personally, I think BF-02 is also a prototype, since it says "Empire Development Bureau" on it. None of the other Zoids have anything like that, and it's kinda odd to have the name of the design team on a mass produced, well, anything.
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 20:32:14 GMT -5
Post by LordGale on Feb 4, 2004 20:32:14 GMT -5
I find it odd that Zoids oft have their designations (I.e. RZ-053) as stickers, since most production aircraft don't feature this. The prototypes, such as the B-1A Lancer, which I've seen, have stuff of that nature.
|
|
|
BF-02
Feb 4, 2004 21:36:43 GMT -5
Post by Colodie on Feb 4, 2004 21:36:43 GMT -5
Oh yeah, that too. Hehe, it's also nice that both sides will let each other know when they're working on a new Zoid, so the designations don't overlap., lol.
But, it would be nice if the stickers were more like the OJR ones. Looking at the original Salamander stickers, it has what looks to be a serial number, plus other designations like F1 and 09 on it. Plus lots of other neat looking and realistic looking stuff.
|
|